You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘homosexuality’ tag.

The conservative Family Research Council has sent a letter to supporters claiming that President Obama wants to pass a law that would “impose homosexuality and silence Christianity in workplaces.” The law in question is the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

First of all, Family Research Council, “impose homosexuality”? You make it sound like the President is planning to force people to be gay.  Secondly, the law doesn’t force employers to hire gay people. It just means you can’t fire or choose not to hire someone solely on the basis of their sexual orientation. If they’re not qualified, by all means, don’t hire them. The law already prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, gender, religion, etc.  You haven’t been forced to hire anyone on the basis of those characteristics recently, have you?  And religious organizations are exempt, so your religious organization is free to continue its bigotry if it wishes to do so.

As for silencing Christianity…ummm…reading…that’s not even in there.  Whether public displays of faith are allowed in the workplace probably depends on where you live and work. Some employers have no problem with it; others might. An Oregon state law going into effect January 1, 2010 says that employers must allow employees to wear religious items at work, except for teachers in public schools (effectively barring some religious groups from teaching in public schools, but that’s another story).

In any case, the Christianity espoused by the Family Research Council does not represent me.  In fact, I think I’m perfectly capable of living out my Christianity in the workplace without being obnoxious about it.  And I’m thinking the Jesus I know would have no problem working side by side with gay people.

We went to church this evening, because an online friend invited us, and because my husband wanted to find out more about this particular church.

I’m not going to critique or review the church, because I think I have no business doing that! However, if it’s 95 degress outside and you’re meeting in a non-airconditioned gym with no outside doors or windows, for the love of God and his people, please set up a couple of fans!

Despite that, it was a pretty good service — good music and a lively message that used clips from movies and tv shows as illustrations.  And being in a church again, after a long absence, made me think.

You see, there are certain beliefs sometimes taught in churches that are dealbreakers for me. If these things are being taught in a particular church, I know I’m not interested in being part of it.

For me, those things are literal creationism (the earth was created 6005 years ago in six days) and the belief that homosexuality is evil. (Quick note — I’m not saying that these are necessarily the beliefs of the church we attended. I don’t know enough about that church and its beliefs to assume anything.)

I know that for some people, my non-belief in those items would be dealbreakers. And some people have completely different dealbreaker issues.

Throughout the history of Christianity, when people have dealbreaker issues with each other, they split into separate groups.  That’s why we have Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant churches. And that’s why we have so many Protestant denominations.

But is that really how it should be? You go your way, and I’ll go mine? That doesn’t really fit well with what Jesus taught (Love one another as I have loved you?).

So what are the alternatives?

Some churches choose to avoid the divisive issues and focus on the more important beliefs that draw us together. After all, the Nicene Creed doesn’t require us to believe in literal creationism and says nothing about homosexuality. Jesus also had nothing to say about those issues.

But this isn’t done universally. So I, at least, continue to avoid churches teaching those things. And I feel guilty about it, because I’m not loving the people in those churches, and because I know that we are not in accord with each other.

Another option might be to openly acknowledge and discuss our differences, lovingly recognizing that we do hold different points of view.

Some people can handle this, but some are absolutely certain that they are right and can’t tolerate another point of view. And I’m pretty close to that myself. I’m pretty darned certain that science shows the earth wasn’t created 6005 years ago in six days, and I don’t understand why anyone insists on arguing that position.  And to me, painting homosexuality as evil is bigotry.  But I’m mostly willing to let people believe what they believe as long as they don’t insist that others follow their beliefs, too.

So where does this leave us? As usual, with much imperfection. I don’t know how to reconcile my strongly held beliefs with the strongly held beliefs of other Christians.

I do know that with God, we can do all things. So I can call on God for love and patience when interacting with people from different viewpoints.